Coming: reading in a language
The high-end paper, three points on purpose, seven points on argument -- the argument is that it's the “gravity wall” that stands for the skeleton。
Well written arguments allow your views to move forward like ladders, so that the arguments can be sewn together like a web of spiders and easily capture the eyes of the reading teacher。
This paper shows you the high-scoring technique of the "parallel" "continuing" "comparance" and the better arguments of the daily people's journal, with hands that teach you to write the "smoke." let's get your papers out of "qualified" and out of the way to "color!"
I. Central arguments, definition and role of arguments
1. Basic features of the central argument
(1) the formulation requires:
The central argument should be presented in the form of a sentence of judgement or prayer to ensure that the language is clear, clear, complete and positive。
(2) structure of the case:
In order to fully substantiate the central argument, it is generally necessary to discuss it from three dimensions (points, lines, face-to-face) in combination with “triangular stability” to make the argument universal。
2. Role and relationship of arguments
(1) central role:
The argument is that the central argument is concretized and analysed through multiple angles and layers (e. G. Different sides, areas or logical layers)。
A discussion paper in the order of 800 words suggested the setting of three points to make the argument fuller and more structured。
(2) subordination:
The split argument is governed by the central argument, which is a holistic and partial relationship。
The extraction of arguments must be premised on and always serve the central argument。
3. Practical significance of arguments
(1) structural value:
The argument is the “bonest” of the dissertation, which clearly reflects the level of reasoning and enhances the logic of the article。
(2) ideas reflect:
Rationally structured arguments show the author's thoughtful thinking and ensure thorough analysis。
(3) writing advantages:
A well-designed score argument is key to winning the paper, both for the reader's understanding and for raising the level of reason。
4. Flexible application of tips
While there are common models (e. G. Parallel, progressive) for the split argument setting, it is not subject to rigid formality and can be adapted flexibly to justify needs。
Ii. Methodology and requirements for the presentation
Generally speaking, arguments can be divided in four ways:
(1) place the split argument at the beginning of the paragraph as a general chapeau
(2) to separate the arguments from the general chapeau
(3) separate the arguments as a summary sentence
(4) the subheadings are separated as subheadings。
At the same time, the following three points should be noted:
(1) partially divided, divided. Three arguments are appropriate
(2) it is justified and can be withheld. The arguments are set in terms of science and cannot be included or intersected between concepts
(3) it's beautiful and smooth. The structure of the article, which is the skeleton of a human being, supports the content of the article and should itself be aesthetic, so the number of words divided into arguments should be roughly the same, and the structure of the article should be symmetrical in order to show parity。
Iii. Perspectives and methodology of the presentation
1. Parallel horizontal breakdown
(1) inquiry into lex specialis - from the perspective of “what”
Inquiring into the lex specialis is the determination of the content or extension of the central argument derived from the transformation of the subject matter and the value judgement of the central argument reveals the fundamental attributes of the central proposition, similar to the definition. This approach generally applies the central argument of nounism, which is best expressed in terms of sensibility and philosophy。
[case 1] theme: tolerance
Arguments 1: tolerance is a big heart。
Interpretative argument 2: tolerance is a distant frontier。
Interpretative argument 3: tolerance is the wisdom to be friends with enemies。
Central argument: learning to bow
Interpret: learning to bow is a humble character。
Subpoint 2: learning to bow is a solid life attitude。
Subpoint 3: learning to bow is more of a human intelligence. (continuing)
Central argument: promoting the spirit of the nation and transmitting the power of china
Interpretative argument 1: the spirit of “two shots at one end” is being promoted in the face of a high level of anger。
Interpretative argument 2: promote a spirit of resilience to earthquakes and disasters that is uninterested and mutually supportive。
Interpretative argument 3: the spirit of the “red boat” is strong and steadfast。
The central argument is that the chinese forces are gathering together to help each other. Love
Interpretative argument 1: at a critical juncture。
Arguments 2: hero in times of crisis。
Arguments 3: together in front of the wind and rain
The central argument: passing on the cultural classics, highlighting the power of china
Interpretative argument 1: passing down poetry and demonstrating china’s elegance。
Interpretative argument 2: revealing patriotism and demonstrating the chinese spirit of qing yong。
Separat 3 : the idea of china working together to win and win is illustrated by the collaboration。
This is the 6th anniversary. Central argument: history, the first years of mind
Arguments 1: it is the foothold of years and a signpost of growth。
Argument 2: it is the bell-caller of history and the bells are ringing under time。
Subsidiary argument 3: it is the bearer of the first heart and the successor mission between generations。
Central argument: against usa, our collective memory
Interpretative argument 1: hard work and never give up. This is one of the deepest marks in the collective memory of the u. S. Government。
Subpoint 2: unite, one nation. This is the brightest point in the collective memory of the united states。
Sub-argument 3: keeping in mind history and developing the future. This is the longest meaning of the collective memory of the united states of america。
Central argument: fighting, our collective memory
In our collective memory, struggle is the light, the darkness ahead。
In our collective memory, the struggle is a sword, a thorn, a song。
Subpoint 3: in our collective memory, the struggle is for the oars that will help us move to a better place in a new era。
The central argument: this is what chinese youth look like
Interpretative argument 1: it is the best way for young people to act as role models for those who contribute to human progress and development。
Interpretative argument 2: young people are best placed to be guided by the principles of commitment and hard work。
Subpoint 3: young people are best served by the goal of achieving the great renaissance of the chinese nation。
(2) the object approach - from the perspective of “who is involved”
The subject-matter approach is to transform the central argument identified in the subject (title) into an act, thought or quality, and then look at the person, thing or thing to which the act, thought or quality may relate, and then add the person or thing concerned as the main language or as a specific list, which becomes the argument。
I'm sorry. Central argument: learning to cherish love, friendship and love
Arguments 1: prejudice the love。
Interpretation 2: valuing the friendship。
Subpoint 3: prejudice love。
The face. Central argument: triple is a face
Interpretative point 1: the triple play is a “face” show about “the rape” of cao cao。
Arguments 2: the triple play is a “face” show about “unthinkable” perforations。
Interpretation 3: the triple play is a “face” show about “loyalty” to guan yu。
The beauty of the sun, our collective memory
Argument 1: the beauty of summer and beauty in culture。
Argument 2: the beauty of the summer, the beauty of humanity。
Tang se song, our collective memory
Arguments 1: tang poe-hye, building our collective memory。
Argument 2: song rhymes, engraving our collective memory。
(3) reason-based approach - from the perspective of “why”
The rationale is to use the central argument as a conclusion to trace the cause of this conclusion and to reveal the cause of the problem through the depth of the phenomenon。
Here the word “cause” refers to the argumentation and the word “effect” refers to the central argument. Once the central argument (results) has been established, the reasons for this result are analysed。
In arguing that “youth age is the golden age”, one might ask why youth is the golden age
Subpoint 1: the age of youth is one of strength and energy。
Interpretative argument 2: the age of youth is one of accumulation of knowledge and growth of competence。
Arguments 3: the age of youth is one of success and success。
[case 2] to argue that the answer is rich and varied, one may ask, why is the answer so diverse
Interpretative argument 1: the world is changing and things are complex, so the answers are rich and varied。
Interpretative argument 2: the answer is rich and varied, given the different ways and perspectives in which people look at the problem。
Subpoint 3: people judge things differently, so the answers are rich and varied。
[case 3] proof of “students for education expedition — i'm looking at it”, why do you say that a higher examination can help in education expediency
Subpoint 1: we know how to fight because of the exams。
Interpretative argument 2: there is a great deal of equity in society as a result of high examinations。
Interpretative argument 3: national education has a new climate due to the high examination。
(4) path approach - from the perspective of “what to do”
The path-by-step approach is to use the central argument as a problem or a task and then ask how to solve the problem or accomplish the task, using the central argument as a result from the perspective of “what to do” and refining the “pathway” of “measures” to meet this result. The central argument here refers to the outcome, while the sub-argument refers to the “pathway” of “measures” to meet the “conditions” of the result。
I don't know. Central argument: to be intentional, one must be resilient, brave, confident and optimistic
Interpretative argument 1: for a person to be intentional, he or she must be patient and not fear the frost and cold rain。
Interpretative argument 2: in order to be intentional, one must be brave and not afraid to sacrifice。
Interpretative argument 3: a person must be confident and optimistic and laugh for life。
Learn to appreciate others. Central argument: learning to appreciate what others need to do
Subpoint 1: learn to appreciate others and ask to have an open mind and an open mind。
Interpretative argument 2: learning to appreciate others is trying to find out what's on them and not to blame them all。
Interpretative argument 3: learning to appreciate others is about helping each other learn, making up for each other and improving together。
This is the first time that i have ever seen anything like it. Central argument: the hot and deep state of the home that millions of people are displaying is provoking, inspiring and giving strength to the endless advance
Interpretative argument 1: real-to-deep home is rooted in spiritual fertile ground。
Interpretative argument 2: real-to-deep home conditions are rooted in hard work。
Interpretative argument 3: to the bottom of the house, to the top of my heart。
Be the youth of the times and help the great renaissance. The central argument is that at this point in the history of the “two hundred years” of struggle, and at this point in the history of the construction of socialist modernization, young people, like chen long, must be the “twilights” of the times, build a sense of realism, promote the quality of hard work, contribute to the great revival of the chinese nation and make the chinese spirit sound on the ground in shinzhou. (end)
Interpretative point 1: being a youth of the age should build a spirit of adherence to the times and become the “twilight” of the times。
Interpretative argument 2: to be a youth of the age, a spirit of realism should be built and the age's “root people” should be established。
Interpretative argument 3: to be a youth of the age, the spirit of hard work should prevail, and to be an old cow of the age。
Three centimetres can be far away. The central argument is that the ideal needs to be achieved with a good body, a good mind and a good mind
Interpretative argument 1: democratic body is the essence of the profession。
Arguments 2: to learn the truth, the thick side has thin hair。
Argument 3: to be realistic and realistic。
I'm sorry. Central argument: youngsters feel that life will always move forward
Interpretative argument 1: maintaining a sense of youth requires a little more optimism and confidence。
Interpretative argument 2: maintaining a sense of adolescence requires a little more exploration and enthusiasm for the unknown world。
Interpretative argument 3: maintaining a sense of youth requires determination and perseverance。
The red ship's original heart. The central argument is that the red ship is safe。
Arguments 1: the tide sails, fights, does not fear hardship, and takes the wind。
Argument 2: the tide sails, devotes itself to the wheel, does not fear danger and sails。
Sub-argument 3: the tide sails, starting with the oars, without fear of challenge, and is steady。
(5) follow-up of the outcome approach - from the perspective of “what”
The result approach is to identify the central argument identified in the topic (title) as a matter of operational life and to imagine what effect or significance the act would lead to。
Let's go
Interpretative argument 1: flying your mind can rekindle hope。
Interpretative argument 2: unleaving the mind can make a big difference。
Argument 3: flying your mind can spread your life。
Like kitai
Interpretative argument 1: it is only by acting with kindness that the earth will be like a white urn that will leave the mud clean。
Interpretative argument 2: if you are to act with kindness, you can be a proud plum in the winter, leaving nothing but a clear breath。
Arguments 3: it is only by doing so that we can act as a shining bamboo in the qingshan, the east-west wind。
2. Progressive vertical decomposition
Inheritance is a method of thinking that goes deeper, deeper, deeper, deeper, deeper, lower to higher, smaller to larger, lighter to heavier. It is generally based on the question-and-answer line “what — why — what to do”。
The central argument of "severely dissect myself" can be deciphered: to move forward, i have to do this relentlessly
How can you “dissect” yourself
Argument 1: be self-aware. If you don't know where the disease is, you can't do it
Interpretative argument 2: it is not enough to be self-aware. (this is the way to dissect yourself.) there's no way to go "sick."
Subsonic argument 3: the courage of self-criticism stems from the pursuit of truth and noble faith. (it's the key to dissect yourself. If you don't know how to do it, you can't do it and you can't really get sick.)
The central argument, "no rules, no squares", can be broken down into:
Interpretative argument 1: without rules, individuals cannot be talented。
Interpretative argument 2: no rules, no stability in the collective。
Interpretative argument 3: the state cannot develop without rules。
[case 3] young man feeling. Central argument: may a thousand sails pass and return to the youth
Interpretative argument 1: the sense of youth is not only the youthful dynamism of appearances, but also the virtues of spiritual purity and spirituality. What is it
Interpretative argument 2: young people feel conscious and fearless, dare to challenge and try. What is it
Interpretative argument 3: a sense of adolescence is the desire and passion to explore the world forever. What is it
The red ship's original heart. Central argument: the red ship's first heart, fighting for greatness
Subpoint 1: the spirit of the “red boat” has shown a revolutionary face, as it has not changed. What will happen? What will happen
Arguments 2: china's wealth is led by the spirit of the red ship, which has not changed its mind. What will happen? What will happen
Subarguments 3: the red ship spirit paints a blueprint for future development. What will happen? What will happen
This is our anniversary. Central argument: preserve the memory and move forward
Interpretative argument 1: the 100-year journey has been vast and new since the beginning of the century. Stand up
Interpretative argument 2: more than 70 years of independence and 70 years of strength. ♪ rich up ♪
Point 3: more than 40 years of innovation, 90,000 lilies. (strengthing)
3. Controlled two-way decomposition
A comparison of the two different things or the different circumstances of the same thing is to be drawn from both the positive and the negative points。
(1) comparative analysis method. This is a relatively simple way to spread the central argument into one that is often divided。
As in the case of “long will and long will”, the focus of the article is to promote ambition rather than three days of fishing and two days of sunning. In the discussion, it is possible to compare the two approaches, “consistent” and “legitimate”, by analysing their respective characteristics and different outcomes, and by making it clear that only ambitious ideals can be built upon and fought for。
If you want to prove "practical knowledge,"
Interpretative argument 1: it is only through practice that you can understand things and grasp them. (face)
Interpretative argument 2: the key to solving the problem cannot be found without participating in practice, and from a practical standpoint, behind closed doors. (overside)
New people of the age. Central argument: five or four spiritual strings continue to sing, and the new age continues
Interpretative argument 1: “the new age”, what an exciting name, what an interesting portrait of a group。
Interpretative argument 2: “the new age” is not new in appearance and age, but new in thought and ability。
(2) articulation analysis. The analysis is divided into two parts。
If it is to be argued that “the key to success is not adversity”, it should be analysed in two ways:
Interpretative argument 1: deficit can create talent, as has been proven in many parts of history and beyond。
Interpretative argument 2: not all adversity can produce talent。
If you want to argue that you have the courage to be ashamed, you should be divided into two parts:
Point 1: there will be a day of success when shame will prevail and shame will prevail。
Interpretative argument 2: to be ashamed and not to be brave is to be depraved and hated for centuries。
For example: to argue that “we need to be both hard and hard,” a specific analysis should be made:
Arguments 1: tweet and lupe depend on the object。
Interpretative argument 2: tibetan and utsine depend on timing。
Arguments 3: the tibetans and the lulls depend on the environment。
Four, seven great points in the daily people's journal
Applicable theme: doing what is necessary
