As many people love paul krugman as many people hate paul krugman。
There is no doubt that the biggest controversy stems from krugman’s frequent appearance in the mass media, his public enthusiasm being comparable to that of mancillo, a leading american economist, and his heated rhetoric and fine writings, which have made him so popular in the space of public opinion。
Subprime crisis, domestic finance, legal, diplomatic hotspots krugman's column is covered, and it's full of shit. For a columnist who “we oppose everything bush supports”, there is no doubt that this has a powerful dissemination effect。
But is it wise for an economist to invest too much in the public domain, and is it appropriate to express an opinion on professional and external topics? In other words, how can the gap between focused academic research and the public interest of public intellectuals be bridged
It is well known that the earliest intellectuals are inextricably linked to the public space, from socrates to zola, and that they gain their reputation. With the rise of institutions such as universities and others, intellectuals have been wiped out in the name of their profession, and colleges have begun to resist the public sphere, most typical of which are hayek and others, and public intellectuals, mainly media representatives, are good professionals in selling ideas. To this day, public intellectuals are almost negatively associated with their academic reputation, as is krugman. The most typical case was when he, while being a guest of enron, said in his column that he was going to deregulate oil and gas and, fortunately, recognized his mistakes in time for his reputation to be restored。
If we restore the public space and view it as an opinion market, the market is likely to fail。
According to a study of american public intellectuals conducted by federal justice posner, academic legitimacy in the public sphere is so fragile that intellectual speech is often based on academic qualifications and is a token of trust rather than a test, as evidenced by a lack of quality control, leading to a growing quality of public intellectual speech. Thus, in the view of the public intellectuals, even when it comes to interests, “it is not so much better to express itself as a mere taste of the facts”. He asserted that the decline of public intellectuals was inevitable。
Krugmanheren is sixth on a list of 100 public intellectuals worldwide, after higgins, and before habemas, a leading economist. Should economists become involved in public policy and even public discourse, it is difficult to determine, but if professionals withdraw from the market as a whole because of market failures, will the market simply be dominated by bad currency, thus exacerbating the mutual indifference of colleges and the public to isolation
In china, in particular, with three decades of economic reform, economists have won unprecedented speech rights, while public discourse has become increasingly out of control with the growth of interest groups and populism. How can quality be rebuilt in the face of a failed market? There is no one-size-fits-all approach, but at least it is important to ensure that economists speak on the record and that credit controls are prevented; secondly, economists ' public statements should also address the stakes。
Finally, it goes back to the different division of labour between the media and scholars: scholars choose what they think they should say, not just the truth; the media publish what they think should be published, not just a voice。
Returning to krugman, krugman was seen as the conscience of the united states and as a paranoid attacker. Whether or not economists are public intellectuals is a free choice, and how to do it will be more important。
The following are the block units that may be affected or involved:
Check out all the shares in the classification
& nbsp & nbsp & nbsp。
