In 2026, the written test was officially opened in ucu province, and the #pax # ran into heat at short notice, with a large number of candidates calling out “not enough time, long drying, and the opposite is clear”, as well as a steady and smooth run. What are the new trends in this year's propositions, as the core of the splitting of the written examination, which directly determines the threshold of entry? How do you score the different modules? How do you allocate time for the exam? In conjunction with the most recent examination, this paper provides you with an overview of the pre-test and the points of response。
This year, the provincial review lasted 120 minutes and 120-130 questions in their entirety, and most provinces remained stable in five main modules, with a steady pattern of change, heavy capacity and reverse. The political theory module is independent of common sense and focuses on current politics and policy theory; common sense judgements that increase the local state of affairs, popular hotspots and legal foundations are less topical; speech understandings are longer, emphasizing linguistic logic and subjectivity; judgmental reasoning leads to a more repetitive pattern, with definitions and analogies closer to life and politics; quantitative relationships revert to the basics, resulting in reduced numbers and improved skills; and data analysis keeps high value for money and more complex and rapid calculations are more critical. It is no longer a simple brush, but rather the speed of reading, logical judgement, time management and trade-offs。
For candidates, the core contradiction of provincial tests is the balance between limited time and a large number of topics. Many people lose, not by doing it, but by doing what they cannot and should not lose. To achieve high scores, it is necessary to capture three gold modules: data analysis, judgement reasoning, interpretation of words, with a score of over 70 per cent, which is the base disc of points. The data analysis target is more than 85 per cent correct, skilled in core formulas such as base periods, growth rates, weights, etc., using fast-tracking techniques such as cut-off, estimations, etc., first looking at the subject and then looking for data and avoiding the unit-time trap. The diagnosis diagrams the four main patterns of location, style, attribute, number, and no decisive jump in 30 seconds; defines the judgment to capture the subject, object, condition, quick match of results; and the logical judgement to reinforce the weakening, translation of reasoning, and precludes the incorrect options of changing concepts, absoluteization, etc. Word understanding of logic is not linguistic, it is linguistic, it is reciprocating; it reads the end of the sentence and the associated word, and quickly locates the subject。
The quantitative relationship between the tests and the common sense judgement is “softly measured for limited time”. Quantitative relationships do not involve total eating, focus on basic issues such as engineering, itinerary, profit and rationing, substitute exclusions, rapid resolution of digital characteristics, and problems are simply abandoned without delay. It is common sense to judge the accumulation of current political, legal, humanistic, technological and social interests, and to believe in the first sense of the term, not intruding or changing the answer。
This year's provincial tests have sent a clear signal that the subject matter is more pragmatic, closer to the demand for public service, that the hard back of the dead cannot work, and that blind sketches are more ineffective. The sprint phase should be reduced by focusing on the real issues, summing up the errors and optimizing the order of responses. Order of recommendation: analysis of information - reasoning of judgement - understanding of words - common sense - quantitative relationships, timely painting of a module and 10 minutes of mobility. In the face of problems, the essence of the exercise is that it is “all-right and no-show” and that trade-offs are more important than hard work。
Following the provincial examinations, a number of candidates have begun to evaluate and prepare interviews. Regardless of how it works, it has to be repeated in time: which modules are timed out? What are the weak knowledge points? Which ones are careless? These experiences are critical for follow-up panels, sprint interviews。
How are you doing this year? Which module is the hardest? The comment section shares your answers and estimates and shares your landing experience
