It's a common knowledge of ancient culture

In my country, you must have heard people describe a man as having more books to read and more books to collect in the house as the word "sweety cow-filled"

Do you know when our country began to have paper books? Is there anything other than mudboard printing? So how do people make books in an age without printing? Since when did the ancients exchange books for other books

Also, do you know what a clerk is and what a writer is? These are the answers you can find in the book " a question and answer about ancient cultural knowledge " 。

China's ancient knowledge system should be comparable to that of the world's culture. It is vast, complex and varied. One door at a time can keep people trapped because the more you know, the more addictive you are. I don't know what to say。

It is no exaggeration to believe that you will accept my statement if you get it。

The author's specialty is the classical chinese literature, and the long history of coding and book history has made the author an expert in the classical literature, thus having a great influence in the field of identification of chinese ancient versions both at home and abroad。

This book, " a question and answer about ancient cultural knowledge " , is one of the author's many classic cultural knowledge. Edited in question-and-answer format, each reader who looks at this ancient cultural knowledge is able to learn clearly and clearly about the cultural knowledge of the ancients, and is no longer a human being, but a true knowledge of the literature。

The knowledge contained in this book covers the history of books, the history of publications, the history of culture and the identification of ancient books. The answers to each question are simple and systematic. In particular, the originality of books is so small that they are so modest。

The author was published in this book. It is to be hoped that when you have a problem with knowledge of ancient culture, you can find the relevant information in tuso, instead of following the wrong path. This is an updated and reprinted version, which is a welcome one。