Question of netizens:
Why did the szema of the story promote lord yu and denigrate liu bang
Quality answer:
It's a pleasure to have your answer. I think there are three main reasons for this。
First of all, when liu bang and feng yu were fighting for the world, while feng yu lost and became a loser, he did nothing but leave behind the image of the world's horrid and ancient heroes, known as “real men”, in keeping with china's traditional culture. Liu bang is the kind of speculator with the ability to reach out and, in this case, the king of the dark。
The second is yu, a respected and noble people from the top of society, and liu bang is a well-born man from the city, a true grass-roots and lower-level society. I feel more or less inclined to judge both of them when they are also the top of society。
The humiliation caused to him by the relocation of sema to the palace is self-evident; this is precisely what the west han dynasty has done to him, and as a normal person, i think there must have been some prejudice。
I hope it will help you
The rest of the netizens replied:
Liu bang, the leader of the farmer's liberation army, has been caught up in the cycle of change in history
As the leader of the farmer's army, lord yu has failed to see the father of jiang dong wang bing sword
In spite of all, shizuma shifu has been promoting xiao yu's confession to demean liu bang. 1. There can be no exception to this day or to any other day when the people of the heavens and the earth have spoken for themselves in the age of history. If not, at the beginning of the rally, the king of the sacrifices will be married to each other, and the losers will not regret their death, and whoever responds to the order will know that it will be difficult for the people of the united nations to do so and will be difficult to achieve success. It is only with caution that there will be no end to it. 3. What is spring and autumn, spring and rain, spring and spring and spring and autumn and autumn and autumn and ice and snow and snow and snow and water? How did he do that? Nostalgia, great-grandchildren, will die and will not fail. It is not in the history of history, but rather in the history of the people, who mourn their lives and their death, who, 30 years after the sema moved to the people rather than to the court, are next of kin, who, in view of the clarity of the times, devote themselves to the court. If, at that time, it was in the hall of pilgrimage, or in this history, or in these words, the fate of which is to be known, is to be understood, the words are to be kept in prison, to be corrupted, to be removed from their male genitals, until life is known, the prophet is known, and it is to be the collective destiny of mankind at that time, and the sema's removal is unfortunate, corrupt, disgraceful, folk writing, 30 years later, and the sema's writing is a blessing, if it is to be written in the hall of pilgrimage, or if it is to be written in such a way, the words are to be destroyed not only in writing, but not only in thinking, but also in the flesh. Thanks to the creation of a new china called the sun and the moon and the new china, the new era has given us an atmosphere in which we can speak freely in pursuit of american politics, so that the spirit of sema's legacy as an unsung and unsettled reality can flourish。
The rest of the netizens replied:
Despite the fact that the episode has been admired by ancient scholars, and that lu xuan has evaluated the episode as an epic song, without any hymns, did the sema move really justice and fairness without a personal emotion? The answer is obvious, but the whole history is in the author's strong personal color。
Sema's move was also a pioneer in the history of the epoch, a subject which, compared to the history of the man's biography as its main theme and the chronology of the chronology, was not a star and a half, so did sima's deliberate distortion of han dynasty and han wuty? Nor is it true that, in essence, the historical events written by the semasha were well documented, but even the same thing, with different words and different writing techniques, played different roles and felt different。
It's not just about demeaning liu bang, gao yu, han shin and others, but it's also about han mu-di, even though the shi ma moved almost without making up stories. Black han wuty, but sema has chosen the worst aspects of han wuji to write, and the human nature is also complex, and the character and events of liu bang and yae yu, who capture the pulse of the times, are all the more complex and diverse, so that sima will deliberately and unwittingly choose those aspects that are detrimental to liu bang’s image, and will never be able to achieve the highest level of zhou yu to denigrate liu bang。
The entire story of liu's family can be said to be not to be distorted, but, as was the case with han mu-ty, semaji did not focus on the merits of han mu-ty's banishment of the huns, unicorns, etc., but rather wrote a monograph of han mu-ty's quest for a fairy tale and his admiration for the fong. So scyllian liu bang is a hooligan, liu ying is a coward, wen dynasty is a mediocre, the king is a punk, han wudhi is a tyrant, and so on. These are one-sided, and they cannot be said wrong, but they are not the full and complete character and merit of the emperors of sihan。
The hanwouti had inflicted the greatest shame on the sema's relocation — the miyagi, the sima's revenge on han wu's and the entire han dynasty — even though the sima's move was fair, the sima's choice must have been biased in the examination and application of historical information, and the history of liu's debasement and promotion of yae yu has emerged。
It's just the fact that he's got history and that he's been forced to commit suicide, and that he's turned into a romantic difference between life and death under the sema's move。
The rest of the netizens replied:
Thanks for the invitation。
Actually, it's just a feeling. I do not think too much personal feelings are in him, and he has done his best to be objective. In the story, we can read lord yu's bravery and greatness, and he can read his fierceness and stubbornness, and he can see liu bang, who is well-versed, tenacious, and he has the treachery to cross the river。
By way of example, they met queen qin, and lord yu said, "absent!" liu bang said, “the big man is like an ear!” those who have good things need to read the words of feng yu and liu is inferior. Did lord yu replace him? It was just a wave of force on the face of the earth, and he had failed to learn about the far-reaching construction that the qin emperor had to do to the future. Liu banggo sings, "the wind is rising." in the wiga sea, it is home. When the antananarivo stood by the quartet, he did reach what he called a “big husband” and essentially inherited the qin regime, creating a 400-year-old foundation。
To put it simply, if someone in nba says, "what's jordan? I can replace him," and others say, "jodam is so strong that i should play like him"? Is there a difference between these two words
The rest of the netizens replied:
Can't you see where liu bang came from
If it is because of this order, i feel that there is a mistake in the questioner's understanding that, since feng yu is the “king of west chu-bak”, the han king of liu-pang or the lord of yu-fu, whether at the historical node or in the order of precedence, is ahead of liu-pang, respecting historical facts and complying with historical principles; if you look at it in terms of content, you will find that si-ma has not denigrated liu-pan, as can be seen from the words of both men's scripts and the words at the end of the term “too historic”。
“it is not a lie to lead me to death and to the sin of not using military force.” it is enough to show that the shima did not admire the yu, but that it was only because he had written the "yen yu" too well, that he had a delusion among generations。
In short, it feels that this statement cannot be justified and can be felt if it is carefully measured by the meaning of words and pens。
