Economic development and the thinking of intellectuals, most of whom advocate for freedom, believe that their ideas are free and not constrained by economic development, are closely related to economic development, especially as reflected in published articles and are compatible with economic development。
Intellectuals are not necessarily officials, but mostly people with no money or power. They have become a group, linked to economic development and social development. In ancient times, the intellectual community has largely had little influence, after all, to become powerful and even to take exams throughout their lives. Once tested, he becomes a public figure and is not a mere intellectual. And most of the intellectuals in civil society are trapped and called “growing poor”. Most of the students who have been killed by the people have been pressured by officials and have failed, and have even developed directly the “cry temple case” of talent such as kim san qi. They have no right to read sage books, but they have to learn to be sage, but they are often unsatisfied. While intellectuals and illiterate civilians become two classes, intellectuals who do not pass the exam are worthless. It is not that they are not trying, but rather that they have too high a cut-off rate for taking examinations, and that the examiner's subjective intent was so obvious when he gave the test that it was like a chance, but they had to keep touching it, to the point that they were so young and wasted their lives。
An ancient era of farming civilization, where intellectuals were subject to this economic model of small farmers, with conservative ideas and largely unacceptable extraterritorial civilizations. Even some of the so-called sages are ideas of the individual, or those that have been transformed in the course of their transmission, rather than those that have been exchanged with other national thinkers. Even if intellectuals were to demand intellectual independence, they would end up being stigmatized by the rulers as defectors and even disparaging. The book of incineration by li qian, the garden with yuan qi, has been afflicted, and now it seems nothing. Late at dawn, the wind rose as a result of capital invasion. The intellectuals were the first to wake up and begin to “open their eyes” to the world, not only with the translated anthem, but also with their own books, such as “theory of the day”, which is the first of its kind. However, industrial manufacturing has not kept pace, and people are held hostage everywhere, and even lose and lose when fighting. The intellectuals suffer, but nothing can be done. Even with a large number of intellectuals studying abroad, learning advanced foreign technology will not revive the country. Depravity of political systems constrains intellectual development and economic development。
After that, intellectuals studying abroad returned. Most of them have to shoulder the desire to revitalize their country, not only by promoting new ideas, but also by fighting the memory of the country. There are outsiders, and there are also “middlers”, more to seek the way to save the nation. Following the introduction of marxism, intellectuals did not rely exclusively on marxism, but had adapted marxism and found a broad path of national salvation. At that time, the economy was underdeveloped and the intellectuals were still “still poor”, but they were passionate, responsible and productive. In particular, revolutionary holy sites often bring in generations of intellectual youth. Their investment in a hot revolution has brought dynamism to the revolutionary forces. Their ideas are more open and manifest themselves in the search for social theory, freedom of marriage, agrarian reform, etc. There will be no land reform if it is not constrained by economic development. While they are free, their minds are not entirely free, but are limited by economic and social development. After a certain period of open thought, and after a windstorming exercise, intellectuals have more real ideas, or more realistic ones, and many people are reluctant to openly present themselves。
During the time of the flowers, intellectuals thought that they would be open to each other in the spring. They were greeted by an anti-right struggle, a cultural revolution. As a result, intellectuals are afraid to come up with new ideas, not even to write poems, not to write articles, to write slogans and slogans. They need food, more spiritually. But when most of the people went to war, where did they think to develop production? Or is there a lack of food and a social environment that is not ideal? Those who were independent at that time were dangerous, as were those who maintained independent thinking. The intellectuals seem to be silent enough to express their own views, even if they do so, as a matter of fact, following “highest instructions”, without any personal ideologue. Even ancient thinkers have been criticized, let alone contemporary thinkers. Shen is no longer writing, but researched on clothing, with less impact. Writers such as zhao shiliang and zhao were severely affected, as the furys committed suicide and zhang zhi xing martyrs were killed by persecution. It is not a lack of honest intellectuals, nor of independent thinking, but of publication and recognition。
After opening up, european winds and rain came in and intellectuals baptized, mostly with an extravagant mentality. They think everything is good in foreign countries, with foreign moons being better than china's round, and many international prizes. There are oscars in the film industry, nobel prizes in literature, and nobel prizes in physics, chemistry, etc. The country seems to wonder why the economy has gone, why the nobel prize-winning physicists, chemists, economists, and the good intellectuals have gone abroad. That is true. Most of the students in qinghua and north are studying in europe and america, and many are not coming back. It's good to be back. Mr. Deng once said that three percent of the students back home would be enough. The economy has grown rapidly and the minds of intellectuals have been opened up, especially in the 1990s, when the intellectuals and literature were more prosperous, and when there were various competing newspapers, the intellectuals had become intellectuals who led and demonstrated open minds, as well as working people. So far, most of the foreign intellectuals have disappeared, are linked to the selection of newspapers, are linked to mainstream ideology and are more relevant to economic development。
The economy had grown rapidly and urbanization had been completed. Some major cities have become internationalized cities, and development is no worse than abroad. The policy of maintaining students abroad, which prevents them from studying advanced and sophisticated technology, is to liberalize economic, literary, philosophical and artistic subjects. Even intellectuals who have learned physics, chemistry, mathematics and aerospace technology will stay abroad and will not normally return home easily unless they are examined abroad. Large and small technology companies have created production lines for computers, smart phones, air conditioning, refrigerators and new energy vehicles. Vehicles in the streets often cause traffic jams, and one building in a city rises and many enter the city as cheap labour. As a matter of principle, intellectuals should have put forward ideas that were edifying, sparking a number of ideas, or had a big discussion, or had a fight, but that was not true. Intellectuals are more cautious, even when speaking in the media is not so radical, let alone the hard of thinking。
Perhaps, with the temptation of capital, intellectuals would have to make money and move away from thinking. Moving from a state of “hard poverty” to a state of underdevelopment seems a tragedy for intellectuals. Nothing is more corrosive than money on intellectuals, nothing more than power on intellectuals. Intellectuals have become “time-scientists” and most of them have studied a few minor studies without presenting their own ideas or competing. I don't know what's going to happen. I don't know if the intellectuals are going to be themselves. Better economic conditions, especially for individuals, do not justify the mixed lives of intellectuals, who need personal independence, freedom of thought and their own positions of expression, and when these positions are bought and controlled by capital, intellectuals transform into expert scholars on capital platforms and become media figures advocating consumerism. Perhaps that is the tragedy of the intellectuals。
