On the afternoon of 14 march, suzhou intellectual property agency (ipo) carried out an event with its colleagues in the mixture, on the theme “sharing in intellectual property agency selection”. The event was shared by general manager zhang xiaoqing and senior patent engineer zhangfan。
Rather than presenting the basic knowledge of intellectual property rights, the sharing event consisted of a pragmatic analysis of practical information on the types of current agents, the real needs of enterprises vis-à-vis agents and how non-professionals quickly identified the quality of patents。
The first is the analysis of the intellectual property agent industry by zhang xianxian, general manager of wise and smart。
Wisdom lists the names of the various institutions whose current market name is called intellectual property services. An in-depth analysis of the operational aspects of the actual expertise of the various institutions and the determination of whether they have a patent agent licence is carried out, from the basic operational capacity of the various institutions, the motivation for their intellectual property services。
In its own case, wisdom demonstrated the official method of licensing patent agencies。
Next, smartness analyses the real business needs of enterprises vis-à-vis patent agencies, and the actual capacity needs of the agencies behind those needs。
Wisdom further provides practical examples of how the real level of agency capacity can be checked in a short period of time and exposes the industry's usual low-quality proxy formula for cost reductions。
After the first sharing, participants had tea break exchanges in the rest area. There was a relaxed atmosphere in which many participants exchanged views on what had just been shared, as well as an opportunity to meet and share with each other. All the participants then took a picture。
In the second, a case-by-case approach by a senior proxy of wisdom and wisdom described the small techniques of non-professionals to quickly identify the quality of patent writing。
As the competitive market environment changes, the demand for iprs by enterprises is expanding from base application agents to higher-value strategic support. High-value services are not a departure from the actual “high-end” concept of the enterprise, but rather professional support derived from the real business landscape. For example, patent retrieval and navigation prior to technology development can help enterprises avoid the risk of duplicate inputs and tort; the creation of patent portfolios around core technologies is an important means of creating barriers to competition。
The value that enterprises can obtain is determined by their intellectual property perspective. If ip is viewed as a simple compliance service, the value of the service is bound to be limited; if it is included in the considerations of operational decision-making and technical layout, the support space that professional bodies can provide will be expanded。
After the full content sharing is completed, the event enters the interactive session. The participants had an in-depth discussion with two guests on the practical problems they faced in their work on intellectual property。
