Building an autonomous knowledge system in china that highlights innovation by working together on knowledge innovation, theoretical innovation, methodological innovation and creating knowledge production systems and discourses with chinese characteristics, chinese styles, chinese styles bureau
General secretary xi emphasized that the construction of chinese philosophies and social sciences should be accelerated and, ultimately, the building of an autonomous knowledge system in china. China is to be seen in china and in the light of the times. China's realism is to be built upon to solve china's problems. It is constantly promoting creative transformation and innovative development of china's excellent traditional culture. It is constantly promoting intellectual innovation, theoretical innovation and methodological innovation, so that china's philosophies and social sciences are truly in the midst of the world's academic institutions. This important discourse provides a profound insight into the way in which china's autonomous knowledge system is built. China's autonomous knowledge system must be built in order to highlight its innovations. It must work together in knowledge innovation, theoretical innovation, and methodological innovation。
For any culture to be viable and far-reaching, it must have its own subjectivity. Building an autonomous knowledge system in china requires breaking the dependency of knowledge production and creating an autonomous knowledge system based on chinese practice. In recent times, the philosophy of western social science has been heavily introduced, but this western-centred knowledge system has limitations that do not fully and accurately reflect the actual and cultural characteristics of the development of other countries and nations. The simple adoption of the concept of “goldar” from western knowledge systems is highly likely to generate intellectual dependency and inertia in apprenticeship thinking. The knowledge system of philosophical social sciences is based on specific material production methods and economies, rooted in unique cultural traditions and social practices. China's dynamic practices and civilizational patterns of social development are well beyond the limits of the interpretation of existing western theories. Therefore, china's autonomous knowledge system must be built on chinese practice, with its roots in chinese culture and fertile land, and its centralist intellectual shackles must be broken with a dominant self-consciousness, and its theoretical and core concepts must be refined. Using the dynamic chinese socialism as an empirical resource and a source of life, it has created new dimensions and new formulations that can be easily understood and accepted by the international community. It has been able to draw up important ideas in china's modernization process and to form a knowledge framework that can explain china's realities. In the face of the proliferation of new knowledge, experiences and information, philosophy and social sciences cannot be satisfied with a superficial understanding. Rather, efforts should be made to build a knowledge system that is compatible with it, to dig up new materials, discover new problems, present new ideas and construct new theories in broad and deep practice, to strengthen the refinement and generalization of indigenous concepts and theories, to interpret chinese practice in chinese terms, and to use chinese practice to advance chinese theory, so that china's philosophy and social sciences can take china's position firmly。
The vitality of the theory lies in innovation, the building of china's autonomous knowledge system, and the promotion of theoretical innovation that runs through the “two combinations” are important strategic initiatives for a new era that responds to global intellectual competition and is firmly based on the “four confidence”. At present, our philosophy and social sciences face the realities of china's social development, and there is an urgent need for systematic intellectual upgrading and theoretical stock-taking of the experiences and achievements of china's modernity and new forms of human civilization; and for an autonomous knowledge system capable of explaining china, leading practice and a world of dialogue in the face of western centralist intellectual paradigms and rhetoric. None of this can be resolved through simple transplantation or indoctrination, and fundamental theoretical innovation must be resorted to. Marxism has brought advanced intellectual theories to china and has awakened the deep genes of chinese civilization with the light of truth; the deep roots of china’s excellent traditional culture have given chinese socialism a distinct “chinese identity” and have enriched marxist cultural life. The key to china's identity is the “two combinations”. The “two combinations” created a new era of marxist chineseization and answered the important question of what kind of philosophy should guide the construction of china's autonomous knowledge system of philosophical social sciences. The marxist “psychology” and china’s excellent traditional culture “roots” provide fundamental adherence to and cultural nurturing for building china’s autonomous knowledge system, greatly stimulates the internal dynamics of theoretical innovation, consolidates cultural fundamentals, opens the space for innovation, roots theoretical innovation in china, responds to china’s problems, and serves its development. The promotion of theoretical innovations that cut across the “two combinations” is not only responsive to china's own development needs, but also conducive to breaking the one-way export pattern of the western language system, creating chinese discourse and chinese narratives, highlighting china's characteristics, chinese style and chinese style in the mutual exchange of civilizations, displaying china's ideas with a clearer signature, presenting china's claims with a more loud voice, and providing new intellectual resources for the advancement of human civilization。
The general secretary of xi emphasized that: “we can and should make good use of the useful knowledge systems accumulated in modern social sciences, the modelling, quantitative analysis, etc., which are effective tools.” knowledge systems should be open to development, not self-confined systems, or single-segregation systems. We need to build on our national realities and open the door to research in order to advance innovative approaches in an open-minded manner. We need to build on both history and the reality of dialogue, drawing fully on the useful theoretical results created by humankind, identifying them in comparison and overtaking them. China's philosophy and philosophy of social science have a cross-section of political, economic, historical and other fields, covering all the multidisciplinary types of traditions, emerging, frontier and cross-cutting, and cold doors. The breadth and depth of theoretical research can be expanded by interdisciplinary integration and technological empowerment in the face of new times. Using new tools such as big data and artificial intelligence, empirical research is being carried out to improve the scientific accuracy of research and to establish the factual basis of an autonomous knowledge system, along with qualitative analysis, theoretical interpretation and logical evolution. Insisting on problem orientation, by identifying problems, sifting them, studying them and solving them in response to the problems of the times, captures the deep logic of the evolution of civilization with theoretical penetrating force. To improve the effectiveness of the dissemination of words, strengthen international communication capacity-building, transform our institutional, organizational and human strengths into international communications advantages, make china's voice more effective, better integrate chinese theory into world academic dialogue, make a shift from reactive to proactive, and demonstrate a credible, cute and respectable image of china through increased communication capacity。
The process of building china's autonomous knowledge system is not only the accumulation and updating of knowledge, but also the conscious deepening and expansion of civilization. Promoting the consolidation of intellectual innovations that are the subject of culture, theoretical innovations that cut across the “two combinations” and methodological innovations that are open and inclusive, will continue to promote positive innovations in conceptual systems and discourse, so that chinese theory will truly take root in reality, with a global perspective, and will form an analytical framework that is both chinese and universal in its dynamic mutual understanding, thus contributing chinese wisdom to the progress of human civilization。
(by the vice-president of the marxist institute of harbin teachers university. This is the result of the nsf project)
Chinese journal of education, 15/01, 05th edition
