Five days before the entrance examination, the 10-year-old window, when “man” is not careful, will hate the entrance examination. How, then, should we respond to some of the sudden developments that have occurred in the course of the examination? Today, at the high school congress, we invite you to jiangsu province, a special language teacher, suzhou city educator, first-time education leader, and wang kaidong, vice-chancellor of suzhou's first secondary school, to present the six great ideas at the bottom of the box, and how to help the candidates in the examination to prepare their essays。
In 23 years of teaching, wang kaidong has taken nine seniors, the leading author of the ministry of education's planning curriculum, the languages of the university, the founder (nearly 200,000 fans) of the wikileakton public name, and 16 monographs such as wang kaidong and deep language, the best teacher does not teach, which have trained three first students in the province and city. This time, mr. Wang's kocko was introduced as a “six great tricks” for emergency response, believing that after reading the queen's secret book, the children might be able to “take over the second line” and help themselves。
First move - use your strength
- when the examiner writes and writes, suddenly he finds his example against it, he hits himself in the mouth. This is not uncommon in the literature of the high court. How, then, should it become a waste and a waste once it is discovered that it is the opposite
For example, a year of high school writing "the ink is not necessarily black." one of the candidates presented the material "mong's mother's trip". But the reason for momma's change is because of the "near black." after writing, the candidates were quick to get the example. This is a time of tension. So how do we fix it
In fact, there's only one example, so don't be afraid. In contrast, it may be because of a strong intellectual capacity, but it becomes a big highlight. We have often said that a typical example should be chosen to prove the case。
But can examples prove arguments? In essence, no example can prove an argument, but an argument, an argument, an argument, cannot be proved. Because when we choose a typical example, it means that an unusual example, a reverse example, is screened out. How can such one-sided examples prove arguments
Thinking about it, if we take out the reverse examples that we've screened out, doesn't that prove our opposite view
Thus, examples can only be perjured and not proven. This is not because we are not paying attention to the role of examples, but because we are told that any example has two sides. That being the case, even if an example of the opposite is inadvertently given, we can still make a difference。
For example, as soon as the story of mon's mother's three-way move is over, candidates can write: the story of mon's mother's three-way move, which is naturally a “close black” story, unwittingly divulges the truth that “near black is not black”。
Meng's mother has moved away, and meng's son has paid off. But who can tell us that this is definitely the result of mon's move? Practice is the test of truth, but whose practice is the test of truth? Because of the non-duplicability of historical experience, some have been given the right to test practice, and others have no chance of testing; but who can guarantee that it is not the truth? For example, if momma hadn't changed, would monko have achieved something? And even more? In addition to the fact that meng's mother became a saint after she moved, there must have been countless mothers who followed meng's mother's example, with three, four, five... Why is there only one monko who is truly famous
It follows that a person will not become black, not around him, but inside him. Controversy always plays a decisive role through internal causes, otherwise we will not be able to understand how we can maintain our iron-blooded heart in the dark of the enemy's hearts
Second move: the battle of the stars
— how can the subject be turned back in time when it is only halfway through the examination that the content has been written? Or is it magic to corrupt a written text
For example, in 2009 the kocau river sou volume " fashion of taste " , many of the candidates found that they were not "fashion" but "classic". Time is so precious and so wrong that, as a matter of fact, it is too ill to return. In fact, there's no need for such pessimism, because it's a good thing to have a good hand, and it's a good thing to move you in between。
The jiangsu written review group defines “fashion” as: aesthetics; creativity; fashion; acceptance and pursuit. It is fashion that must be accompanied by these four characteristics. No classic is meant to be fashionable, and it's a classic of taste。
However, it should be noted that all monographs are not without cause. The link between the two is always inextricably linked, and it is incredible that the difference between the two should be analysed in such a way that the concept of the article can be clarified and further elaborated。
For example, for the fault above. You can make up for this:
And above all, we have spent a great deal of pens on the classic, but unfortunately it is not fashion. Although the scriptures are aesthetic, shared and pursued, fashion is fashionable and creative, and the two are quite different. Because the book is eternal. It has gone through long years of washing, dusting and freezing. Interestingly, the classics are not fashion, but fashion can be turned into classics。
The article has since been translated into a classic discussion of fashion. The features of fashion, its connotations, appear to be clearer in comparison with classics, while the trend towards fashion leads to a deeper layer of articles. Isn't that just fashion
This is not only the case, but also because of the contrast, the article has more tension and deeper meaning。
The third move - the shasa tower
How should the centre be brought to the fore at a time when, in writing, the examiner is unwittingly speaking about his or her diverse understanding of the material
For example, in 2008, fujian gacchi, three people went into shops to buy drinks, one for sweets, one for sweets in pain, and one for light. Write an essay on the basis of this scenario, with the title drawn up。
For such material, many candidates will have three different meanings in detail, with no purpose or purpose. This became the "two yellow willows" and the "a line of white beaks on the sky" was lost。
How, then, can we bring together the myriad of discourses, the sand towers, the upper floors, and the centre stand out
Structuralism points out that the world is not made up of objects, but of relationships between them. At this point, it is necessary to identify the intrinsic links between the three, to analyse their relationship, to compare it or to map it. An analysis of the transformations between these relationships, or above them, and a higher level that allows it to capture the first three, makes the articles very well built and visible. For example, once three beverage options have been elaborated, they will gather the sand tower and close the whole page。
It's not too cumbersome to say that there are three options: on the contrary, my view is that “three” means nothing: two, two, three, three, three choices, and countless choices。
Let the sweet ones choose the juice, the light ones choose the mineral water, and the bitter ones choose the coffee, so that everyone can take what they want, what is wrong with that? Differences are the source of happiness; and, unlike, the path of harmony。
To go further, rather than saying that different people have different preferences, the same person will have different choices over time. “junior readings, such as the mid-story moon; middle-aged readings, such as the lunar moon in court; old-age readings, such as the moon on stage.” the world is rich and diverse, and life is changing. Can't we just stay together
The fourth move is to repair the dead
The candidates had forgotten the analysis of the core topic, and had seen it as a concept, a whole package, a date to swallow, and a sticker. If there is a sudden awakening in the middle of the journey, how can this be adjusted to make a difference
In fact, the problem of packing as a whole is most serious, as there is no justification. But it is not too late to wake up, and to make up for the dead. This time, it can be restored. What is fashion? What is fashion? What is fashion
“fashion” is fashionable, aesthetic, a unique creative and personalistic quest of some, shaped by imitation and fashion. Fashion pursues a different personality, but hopes that it will be imitated and fears that it will be imitated by all. Fashion has its origins in unique creativity, but hopes to be fashionable and afraid of a long-term epidemic. Fashion is always on the way. Fashion is always at the climax of “bright death” and fashion is at the height of fashion, but in a few years it may be “reborn in ashes” ..
Fifth move - life by birth
What should be done at a time when material is too difficult, too sophisticated, too confused to grasp the point? Well, kids, once that happens, congratulations are coming。
For example, nanjing, salt city ii, a post titled:
The famous russian composer grazunov listens to two young people playing brahms second symphony. They played pretty bad. Grazunov asked them if they'd heard it before, and they said, "no, never." and grazunov groaned, and said, "you're so lucky, young people, there's so much good that you're going to find, and i'm already hunting, unfortunately."
There's too much on the subject. You can't hold on to the point. You can write all your confusion on the basis of the subject. The more confused the better and the more logical the layer of questions are, the better。
For example, why did grazunov sighs? Do people think they're unhappy? What's behind this artist's feeling unfortunate? It can be done from the perspective of awareness of the problem and from the perspective of the pursuit of artists。
Young people are lucky. Why are they lucky? Explain your reasons. But the problem is again. If we're lucky to know nothing, aren't we all lucky? Isn't that ridiculous? So the question is again, since it's not necessarily the lucky ones who know nothing, why does grazunov say that what lies behind his language
When you analyze your confusion, show your struggle, or, whether you are smart or not, give your own explanation, whether or not this knowledge is good or not, a good paper has come out, because your ability to interpret is not based on your perspective。
Number six: one step into the sky
What should we do when the exam is only a few minutes away and the article is not finished? What should we do
First of all, there must be a hurry to finish the article, which is two concepts. In the case of jiangsu province, the high-level examination was graded after completion and insufficient number of words. The number of words to be deducted is less than one point for every 50 words less and up to three points for each article that is clearly unfinished, depending on the size and content of the article, but the maximum score is not more than 46 (reference: less than 100 words, 0 to 5 points; approximately 200 words, 6 to 10 points; approximately 300 words, 11 to 20 points; approximately 400 words, 21 to 30 points; approximately 500 words, 31 to 40 points; and 600 words, 41 to 46 points). Perhaps many students know how to finish it quickly, but how? I offer several ways。
The first is direct. One sentence is a stand-alone one, one angle and another sky。
They will eventually become us。
- "they."
The second is summary. Summarize the arguments in a set of rows, and then close the sentence and draw a line。
It is only when we leave that we reach the ideal and the destination; it is when we struggle that we succeed in glory; and it is when we sow our seeds that we gain. Only in pursuit can you have good taste。
— seek
The third is philosophical. Use of the relevant philosophical terms, covering both the entire text and the sense of symbioticism, is no longer exhaustive。
I stretched out my hand to cover the light of the sunset into my eyes, as if it were an illusion of darkness, thinking that the road fell and fell, and that it could not stop the tears falling. Drink your last cup of coffee with your head on your back. Woolf smiled and said, "let's remember the years we spent together, love, time." - i saw it in the coffee
The third is a short poem. Just a few questions, no rhymes, condensed, simple, which means you'll never be able to。
I remember a classic poem by peter lark:
I'm thinking
Walk free
My deep sympathy for myself attacked me
So thick
I couldn't help crying
— compassion
The fourth is humor. Nice, smart, funny, glamorous, laughter-like。
Buying fashions, singing fashions, playing styles, playing styles. We've got a little taste, and the rest is we're digesting ourselves. Remember, taste of fashion, so-called fashion, chewing it back, but not just swallowing it, like chewing gum!
- taste fashion
And finally, wish all the children the best of your own glory in june, and believe your teachers and your parents, that they will laugh in the bush when the flowers fall
