In ancient china, the title system is an important part of the socio-political structure, particularly in the zhou generation, where the title is divided into five levels: public, ho, bao, son and male. The title, which is a special honour not only for individuals or families, but also for the nobles and loyalists, represents power, status and corresponding privileges. Historically, the type of title and the manner in which the title is given have changed with the changing times. For example, in han chu, liu bang, in addition to the crowning of the crown prince, has sealed the kingship of seven important loyalists, such as peng tung and young-nam. Wei dynasty's vegetative vegetative vegetatives are sealed down as chen wang and guo zhi yi of tang dynasty are also sealed as liuyang county king. In the chong dynasty, tazunur hacht even named his son azig as prince of england, dodur as prince, and haug as prince of judas。
Similarly, the title seals of song dynasty, ming dynasty and qing dynasty are unique, such as the song dynasty kao-chun, wang an shiuk-chuk, sema-kwang-kwun, lee-dai-sun-jun, li weng zhong-gyu, liu ki-bang and wang yang-ming-buk. The emperor of qing dynasty was named first-class, and the left-class, second-class, and the li hong-chul, first-class。
The male son of hoop hau is an expression of the power structure of china's ancient society. It is not only a name for the sojourn but is also an important part of the feudal hierarchy. The original title system was closely linked to patriarchal and sub-enclosed systems, which were mutually reinforcing. The height of a title usually signifies a person's political status and right to rule over the feudal lands, but with the development of society the system of titles has gradually shifted from the level of military command and administrative functions to purely political titles and economic privileges。
According to the qin literature, the title of the zhou generation is divided into five categories: public, hoe, son, and male. One of them, under monkoh van, documents the system of titles at that time, while the monsignor queen's order expressly excludes the son from the realm and singles out the remaining four titles: the lord, hu, the lord, the son and the man. Different views have been expressed about the specific functions and allocation of these titles, particularly in the context of the three generations of summer, commerce and week. However, the information provided in oracle and gold gives us some insight into the cortex of the period from the western week to the state of war and confirms its basic design of the title and order。
Many regional leaders also enjoy relatively high titles in commerce, in addition to public office and public office. The records in oracle show that fangbao and bongbak of the democratic people's republic of korea are in fact the leaders of the great countries, who are responsible for defending the borders of the merchant kingdom and for handling the war. The kings of commerce often send soldiers to assist these local leaders in their fight. The names of fong-bou and bong-bou reflect their affiliation with the king of commerce. In addition to this, the trades department has mentioned in oracle, as well as possible male and sub-branch titles, which may also be associated with dynasty feudalism。
There is still controversy among scholars as to whether or not the title is the title of the business generation, but it is certain that the system of titles during the weeks of western and spring and autumn is relatively clear and broadly divided into levels of king, king, lord, hue, bo, son and man. In this system, the duke and marquis have a more prominent position, while the viscount and baron are usually at lower levels。
With regard to the height of the title, we often consider that the marquis has a higher status than the count, but history has not been simple. The status of the 800 pagodas in the era of commerce, such as fong-bou and bong-bou, who, as leaders of the great nations, manage the affairs of different regions, is also very important. During the eastern week, wu wangfaw was also named as an uncle and a sovereign of the country. This suggests that titles are not entirely hierarchical, and that sometimes the meaning and status of the same title may change at different historical times, and the difference between the count and the marquis is not as obvious as might be imagined. In general, the division of titles between male hoppers is more than just a simple class of society; it carries many political, historical and cultural significance. For ancient rulers, the title is not only an honour to the loyalists and families, but also represents their political decision-making and the consolidation of feudal power. For ordinary people, these titles symbolize an era of political patterns and divisions of social structures。
