Learning about the definition and status of intellectuals in comrade zhou enlai about the reform of the communist party, the intellectuals are intellectual workers, intellectuals in the category of working people are not a class, but intellectuals in the “working class” are not an independent class, but a social class of intellectual workers. Generally speaking, the vast majority of this class is attached to and served by the ruling class at the time under certain social conditions. The definition and status of intellectuals is that of intellectuals who work in the world in the sphere of the creation of working people, who are the main agents of the creation of world and social practices, as agents of the transformation of nature for the creation of social wealth, as well as of the transformation of society for the development of society. As workers, intellectuals, together with workers, farmers and other workers, create social wealth and promote social development. The definition and status of intellectuals is not a class, but rather a “part of the working class” intellectuals is not a class or a unified class, which is also a fundamental view of marxism with regard to intellectuals. Zhou en has creatively upheld and developed this marxist idea. In june 1925, back in the period of the democratic revolution, zhou en came to state that, like the army, “intellectuals are tools, and they do not produce, nor do they rob others and become their own. He's not a class at all. He's an intellectual or an intellectual.” zhou enlai's idea of knowing a person “not a class at all” is a correct view of the actual situation of chinese intellectuals and a scientific summary of the intellectual class identity theory. The definition and status of intellectuals in terms of their place and role in the revolution and construction “revolution requires the absorption of intellectuals.” this is a scientific summary of the practice of the proletariat revolution in our country. According to mao, “in the long and brutal struggle for national liberation, in the great struggle to build a new china, the communist party must be good at absorbing intellectuals in order to organize the great resistance, organize millions of peasants, develop revolutionary cultural movements and develop a united front for the revolution. “the definition and status-building of intellectuals requires, inter alia, the absorption of intellectuals. Intellectuals are a “great force” in our socialist construction. The construction of socialism “must rely on the active labour of intellectuals, in addition to the active labour of the working class and the farmers in general, i. E. On the close cooperation of manual and intellectual labour and on the fraternal union of workers, farmers and intellectuals. What we are doing is increasingly requiring the participation of intellectuals.” as a result, zhou en came to the conclusion that “revolution requires the integration of intellectuals, especially in building”. The definition and status-building of intellectuals in particular require the absorption of intellectuals. Intellectuals are a “great force” in our socialist construction. Zhou en has come to demand that all branches of the party and organizations at all levels give high priority to intellectual issues and take effective measures to fully mobilize and play the role of intellectuals in keeping with the country's rapidly growing needs for intellectuals. The definition and status of intellectuals has led intellectuals to zhou en, who have placed great hopes in our country's intellectuals, particularly the scientific and technological communities, by saying: “we must pursue with urgency and strive to expand and enhance our scientific and cultural strength as rapidly as possible, and to catch up with the world's advanced level in a relatively short period of time. This is a great battle mission for our party and the nation's intellectual community and people.” in the process of developing modern chinese intellectuals, the development of modern chinese intellectuals from old societies was undoubtedly influenced by imperialism and the reactionary ruling class. It cannot be said that the old social services, even if they were not directly for the warlords or the national party of the north, were not affected by the old society. There is no future for intellectuals who have been educated by the bourgeois class, and even for some, who have been built to educate china’s modern intellectuals. History has shown that intellectuals can only move forward with the proletarians, the working people and the communists. This was demonstrated both during the revolution and during the period of socialist construction. China's modern intellectuals are developing a policy of solidarity, education and transformation with other workers, beginning with self-reforming the proletarians against the national bourgeois and fighting against other workers in alliance with other workers. The current intellectuals ' party, which has given many intellectuals ' representatives their rightful place in the process of self-reform, has improved the quality of their teaching in some 40 per cent of the country's higher education institutions. The scientific and technological community throughout the country has achieved remarkable results. There is now a significant increase in the political presence of senior intellectuals in our engineering community, based on an estimated 100,000 graduates of national institutions of higher learning, who are increasing their level of knowledge more rapidly
