It's common to talk about photography in many terms, such as radiums, fast doors, isos, but even though some, such as shutter speed, are less accurate than the exposure time, it's not very different. And the following seven are very irritating, and if you can, i really don't want to。
1) drones
The so-called drones are translated from drone, or an abbreviation like "unmanned aerial vehicles", even used by dji itself (which also uses aerial vehicles). But the concept at the heart of the so-called drone is really remote control, flying and filming, rather than nobody, so the more appropriate name is the already existing "aeroplane," which is a really accurate description. (dji's camera calls itself a aerial camera, inconsistent)
If there is no filming capability, the old term "controlled four oars" should be followed, and drones should not be used. To say the least, washing machines and televisions are drones, and the name itself refers to very poor capacity and is far from accurate. (someplace with an empty camera, right? I'm not sure
2) hosseil
Hossai is the mainland chinese name for the world press photo prize, just because it originates in the netherlands/the foundation is based in the netherlands. The term is annoying because the netherlands has hundreds of photography competitions a year, and, according to this logic, hundreds of it. Or, this is a very arrogant statement, as if there was only one race in the netherlands, none of which was in the eye, so that it was enough to represent the netherlands and so on。
This poorly thought-out way of naming sars, known many years ago, was itself sars, which was not well known at the time of early detection, but only in the general sense of "atypical pneumonia," which ended with hong kong’s translation of “sharks” and china’s use of “sars.” but what if there's an atypical gastroenteritis in the future? What about atypical arthritis? What about atypical chinese
3. Quality
The quality is the quality, the quantity is the quantity, but some (mainly china) have made two different concepts into one word, and then replaced the already accurate "quality" of quality, and "quality" itself has the meaning of physics mass, a concept that is not alien to most people where education is widely available, so it is very disheartening to say that, in any case, "the lens is of excellent quality."。
Perhaps you would say that it's a concept of quality quantification, like paint, like human values, really? Really? Should it be quantified? The term itself is a chinese regional vocabulary, but the media or users who have also infiltrated hong kong in recent years have been used to it for a long time, but today at least they are agitated。
4) full edition
This is really going to be used to it for a long time, but every time someone asks, "is it a little more than a whole picture?" the term itself is problematic. Despite the agreement that it's full fRame is equivalent to 135 of the philenian era, and even the "equivalence focal length" is usually used to refer to 135, but full/all is very misleading. It's common for 8x10 to be large, but it's a little bit more than 8x10, full fRame will turn into a "full 8x10" reference, causing a lot of confusion。
It was said that the term itself was commercial in order to market products, and that it felt superior to allow consumers to buy “full” cameras. As a result, it has also been quite successful。
5) no back camera
Mirrorless has become the dominant term, which in itself is a name created in relation to a single mirror mirror, and although i am also using it, it is in fact not a good sense, because leica m is also non-resistible, even iphone is non-resilient, only the name "no mirror" and does not tell consumers any substance。
The name should have come from milc, but it was too long, and it didn't turn out otherwise. Taiwan's name is "micro-single" and it's actually a good concept, but "one-eyed" is not very accurate because the heart of slr is a mirror, not an eye. Unless a single eye describes a single eye to take a picture of it, so the microbill would have been good..
6) computers
The chinese word again. It's been a long time since computers are too easily confused with the machine, and "computers" are a fairly powerful name compared to them, and they can cover or distinguish terms such as computing, computing, computing, etc. Now it's called tablets in china, like ipad
"current drawings" are much simpler and clearer than "putting pc drawings."。
7) video/ photography
Videography is a technology that has become increasingly accessible to photographers in recent years, i. E. Film. For me, it's like recording a video on tv with a vhs or something, and it's like taking an active video camera. But when it comes to daily use, it is true that a lot of people do it on both sides, and it's just that everyone understands that it's just that it's a little irritating for a person to say "no more."。
It's not a question
This is a term that many hong kong netizens hate in recent years, because the word "micro" has some chinese styles like weibo, weibo, and it's also like being named in such a way as to have short films。
However, i think it has a substantive and unique implication, because the short film itself is a short film, and so is the short film, "football into the game" , but there is no drama, and the short play is not a way to describe the nature of film-making. As for microfilms, it is true that the techniques used to imitate movies, such as scripts, spectroscopes, start-up transfer, coloring, etc., are just 5-10% of the length of a normal film。
