Wang ming yi
Our time is one in which innovation is urgently needed while providing unprecedented opportunities and conditions for innovation. In this era, “mass entrepreneurship, mass innovation” has become the basic consensus of all sectors of society. Globally, modern universities, in their interaction with society, have won the reputation of “the power station of the technological revolution, the axis of social development” with their own achievements. In the creative age, how can contemporary chinese universities adapt and lead the development of this new era in a timely manner, demonstrating the great spirit and mission of modern universities
Work closely with the government to build intelligent communities。
From the world university development practice, the full sense of cooperation and behaviour between universities and local governments began in the 1960s with universities in the united states. The united states enacted the morell act in 1862, which opened the way for university cooperation with local governments. At the same time, the government has encouraged the establishment of new universities for the economic and social development of the serviced areas, mainly through grants, known as “grandlands universities”. At the beginning of the twentieth century, the well-known wisconsin concept for the economic and social development of the region was developed through the practice of the university of wisconsin. This concept, together with the development of talent and scientific research, has become one of the classic functions of modern universities, spreading throughout the world and promoting the concept and practice of cooperation between universities and governments. During the second world war, the partnership between the university and the government played a tremendous role in the war, creating a widespread awareness that the university, once it was married to the government, could produce a tremendous force to determine the fate of the world and reverse its situation. After the second world war, universities and research institutions were flexible in their attitude, cooperating fully with the government in the economic, political and cultural fields, and receiving corresponding remuneration and funding for research. By the 1960s, clark kerr, then president-in-chief of the university of california in the united states, had creatively introduced the concept of a “big university” and launched an “entrepreneurial university wave” that later spread throughout higher education practice throughout the world, and the university had rapidly grown into an “intellectual city” embedded in social development. Thus, the deeper collaboration between universities and local governments is no longer a strategic arrangement, but rather a key value orientation for modern universities, which is a necessary choice for building a truly good society and nation. Innovating entrepreneurship education at contemporary chinese universities only becomes more evident in the legitimacy and legitimacy of their practice in such a world hierarchy of higher education development。
Creation of intellectual capital and cultural orientation for social development. As a result of the wave of university entrepreneurship, university knowledge production is increasingly focused on market and social needs, on the transformation of technological results of knowledge and on the profitability of factories or companies that build on this transformation. As the academic community understands, there are two main types of knowledge in modern universities that are moving towards innovative entrepreneurship: commercialized knowledge and symbolic knowledge. The former focus on practicality and technology and are profitable; the latter focus on ethics and aesthetics, not profit. In modern universities, commercialized knowledge is more popular. Driven by commodified knowledge, intellectual property has become an important right, and university teachers and students view intellectual property as the most important thing on campus. The practical or applied aspect of the knowledge and technology produced by the university, which is a centre of social intelligence, could have been justified. Even the knowledge created around individual interests is of practical value, both from the materialist point of view of “the human person as the sum of society” and in the ultimate sense of knowledge. University knowledge production also creates material conditions and guarantees for the discussion of the truth of human beings only when it is of practical value. Knowledge capital is therefore linked to industrial capital, and large enterprises are associated with higher education institutions, a logical logic for the synergistic development of institutions and enterprises in the late stages of transition development. It is important to note that knowledge capital is an important, but not the only, feature of modern university knowledge patterns. When knowledge is converted to industry, government, etc., it also needs to focus on what goes beyond the benefits, that is, human education. Humanities and sociological knowledge are also intellectual capital, and at the spiritual level, even more important capital, can acquire the value of its existence in the service of society, such as the democratic view of socialism, the scientific spirit and the humanistic care, which are not only of great value to human development, but also determine how intellectual capital is used and distributed, thus determining the fundamental nature of socialist society。
(c) build students ' entrepreneurial capacity and promote equity in university education. University education is the highest level of education and the last stage of formal education before people enter society. The level of education people receive in formal education determines not only the quality of their future lives but also the extent of his contribution to future social development. Chinese society is a socialist and democratic society that requires everyone to be educated and, with the help of education, to achieve unlimited enrichment of the human personality and to exploit the potential of the human person and the unlimited possibilities of its endowment. A socialist democratic society requires that a person who has contributed to society through education is dignified and deserves respect and reward regardless of his profession or occupation. Achieving equity in access to knowledge and building on that equity, educating everyone about the potential for innovative entrepreneurship, understanding of society and equitable communication are the most important political responsibilities of modern universities. Knowledge is no less valuable, and capabilities are no more hierarchical, as long as it is based on the need for innovative entrepreneurship based on individual endowments and appropriate to society. The development of university classifications, based on the classification of knowledge, is the result of the natural choice and the efforts of different universities, which need to be oriented towards market and social needs and self-empowerment. Efforts should be made to become a base for the production of knowledge, a home for the conversion of the individual's soul, a fertile ground where the potential for innovative entrepreneurship takes root, and a culture of socialist democratic values. It is in this sense that giving students the desire, the action and the ability to innovate in entrepreneurship is not an implicit but a fundamental political responsibility of modern universities。
To address business issues and promote university entrepreneurship. The interests of universities are of general interest to national and social development. In the overall interest of the university, there is an interest in serving the economic and social development of the region, and in the economic interest of enterprises. Businesses, with profit production at their core, need continuous technological upgrading and product upgrading in order to create more social wealth to meet the needs of society and improve people's living standards. Without the profits generated by technological upgrading, any enterprise would lose its opportunities for development in the competition for a modern market economy and be irrevocably eliminated by society. Once the entrepreneurial system of a society has lost its vitality, the order and wealth in which it operates will be frustrated. In modern societies, the dilemma caused by the collapse of the economic system is no worse than that caused by the failure of war years, which can also lead to the collapse of the administrative system of society as a whole. Universities have, of course, provided the main technical and human support for enterprises. However, this is far from sufficient in modern society, especially in the era of industry 4. 0, where the development of enterprises places higher demands on universities. In the past, there was a considerable distance between the scientific principles invented by universities and the transformational applications of enterprises, and today the distance is shrinking. In the era of industry at 4. 0, when the “smart technology system” became the core pillar of the new enterprise system, in part scientific research and product development, the transformation of science principles and technology into enterprises was even instantaneous, enterprises and universities were becoming seamlessly connected, and modern universities needed to adapt their professional technological production structures in due course to become the driving force for enterprise development. It is in this sense that it is not a stopgap measure for modern universities to confront the challenges of enterprises by making them a subject of teachers and students. The service industry has become an important mission of modern universities in its era of 4. 0 and in leading its healthy development by importing it into the path of service to human well-being。
(sichuan polytechnic institute, secretary of the party)
