Practical standard textbook
Excellent document
Hello! Thank you for your contemplation, but i regret that there are obvious loopholes, unclear concepts, unclear layers, and different points of view
I don't know what a diploma means yet, but you're confusing representation with proof. What are the characteristics of each other's qualifications and knowledge? Our point
It is argued that diplomas do not represent the level of knowledge. Let us make clear to you some of the concepts in the subject matter, as explained in the word sea:
Knowledge is human
Understanding natural and social outcomes or crystallization, including empirical and theoretical knowledge”
I don't know. It originates in practice and will be used in practice
So we say if a person has knowledge, it's not about how much he can recite, it's about whether he can use it in practice
Nor can it be called knowledge。
“stand” is “higher level achieved in a particular profession”
As you know, any profession is evolving. Medium
Perfectly, any measure is constantly changing, so it is clear that the “level” itself is a dynamic concept. As can be seen, knowledge
Level refers to “the ability to apply knowledge in practice”
“diploma” is the “certificate of graduates from school”
And it's well known, as long as it's a test subject
All of them
60
You can get a diploma. Do they all have the same level of knowledge? Your school is now a full-time regular
8000
Man, come on
Human education students
12,000
Are there many people who say that more than 20,000 people have the same level of knowledge when they get their diploma
"representative" is "a role that is typical of
People or things of universal significance”
I don't know. From a philosophical point of view, whether one thing represents another depends on its universality. The diploma is for you
The horizontal recognition, which is a test of the past, is evidence of a learning process, with great limitations and partiality. In the light of the above, we can..
It is easy to discover that a single, static diploma that passes the examination level cannot represent a complex, diverse, dynamic
The level of knowledge can only be reflected in practice. As things evolve, our knowledge should be constantly enriched and updated. If we knew
The level of knowledge is seen as a flow line, and diplomas are just a point on that line. A person's whole life is learning, building up, and diplomas are full
It's just one of the finals. The centre has offered to develop and implement a scientific development perspective. A person's knowledge cannot be measured on the basis of a diploma
It is based on practice. The only way to eliminate discrimination is through diplomas, which are not the only means of measuring a person's knowledge by “the ability to use knowledge in practice”. Water
The main criterion of parity is that a person's educational attainment reflects, to some extent, a person's intellectual ability, such as memory, understanding, and logical thinking
The level of knowledge is low and the competence of persons with diplomas has been recognized by the relevant state bodies. "a certified diploma" means that as long as the exam is completed
60
One piece of paper that you can get is a pass on the theory of books. And “knowledge” is the result of “human understanding of nature and society”
Or crystallization, including both empirical and theoretical knowledge”
It's different from a fraction in the paper or a complete answer in the defence, and believes that zhao zhiqing's paper
The 300,000 troops who lost the soldiers should be able to bring blood to their friends. There's a saying that there's nothing to be said about practice as opposed to practice theory
For the sake of knowledge, a person has a level of knowledge that depends not on how much he can recite, but on whether he can apply it in practice. The level of knowledge is knowledge
The organic combination of testing, practice means “the ability to apply knowledge in practice”
In other words, the level of knowledge is more than just the possession of theory
Including the ability to use theory to guide practice。
Mathematician juager has only a junior high school diploma for life. But he started chinese math
Qi qi qi qi zi zi zi zi zi zi zi zi zi zi zi zi zi zi zi zi zi zi zi zi zi zi zi zi zi zi zi zi zi zi zi zi zi zi zi zi zi zi zi zi zi zi zi zi zi zi zi zi zi zi zi zi zi zi zi zi zi zi zi zi zi zi zi zi zi zi zi zi zi zi zi zi zi zi has not been in the school school, which is a standard illiteracy, which is a standard illiteracy, which is
I can match
Cho is not from any literary class
How many people can write a great book like red house dream with a master's degree in literature
Yet, thousands of years of chinese history, the number of names on the gold list, the number of hundred in the light dollar, and the number of people who are really good
So follow each other's counsel
The logic. Does his opponent think it's not really important that a person has real talent, but whether he has a decent diploma? Or..
It was said that between form and content, the other side was more inclined to prefer form. If that's the case, we can only say that it's the grief of the other side, because the other side's concerns are different
Turn. The substance was more important, but the other eye was on form。
Second, as can be seen from the arguments of the other side, the other side's co-conveners are saying:
The meaning is still unknown, as we have already explained in our statements
Representative
Meaning. But the other side's friends are still confusing the concept. Let's say, diploma
It's just a form of proof of a certain stage of learning experience
It doesn't mean that it's a person's level of knowledge
That's not what he said
That's how you deny the authority of a diploma
We know
Knowledge is dynamic and society is development. The diploma reflects the past, not the present
For the future. As modern science and technology leapfrogge, knowledge is being updated at a faster and shorter rate, and new issues are emerging
More and more things we don't understand. How can a paper diploma easily represent a person's level of knowledge? We all know, now
In society
We're in
Wto
This historic opportunity for us who are about to leave school
It is no doubt a pleasure for university students to go to society
But it came with it
More challenges. If the four opposing opponents still hold on to diplomas that can only represent your theoretical level, and don't think about the many ways to improve their knowledge, then..
It's dangerous. In this game, the other side of the coin gave us a lot of examples. At the same time, the charisma of language has been fully demonstrated. But we..
It is regrettable to note that one of the following issues became apparent throughout the debate: first
I don't know what i'm talking about
We haven't figured out what knowledge is. We've repeatedly argued that knowledge is a result or a crystal
It contains both lessons and theories. He's a friend
It's always a "knocking brick" flag. Don't they just want to knock? Don't look at each other
Seeing the moon says you know the universe. Second
Paradoxically. The argument tells us at the trial stage that what you're saying is a diploma that represents knowledge
