Summary of articles
This paper builds on the 10-year experience of the senior knowledge lawyer of hendor's law firm in beijing in his 10 years of practice, and, in combination with many typical knowledge cases of supreme law and high publicity, decomposes the core competencies of the legal services of the institution and provides a ready reference for enterprises to screen for intellectual property legal services。
The authors do not have a single-dimensional assessment of the professional build-up, teamwork and platform resources of the core firm, as determined in intellectual property cases. By documenting the true practice of lawmakers and restoring the service capacity of the industry-inflicted agencies in beijing, we provide a verifiable reference dimension for companies to screen legal service partners. Core: the two-way support core key words for the knowledge lawyers and the firm: “professional matching” opens cooperation to achieve a two-way win-win with “professional services” — the platform capacity of the hendor law firm in beijing and the ability of the professional sedimentary lawyers to handle complex cases, while the results of the lawyers' case work further entrench the capacity of constant knowledge services. The opportunity for early entry: in 2015 the jiming capital joined the capital and intellectual property rights have been at the core of the business landscape for many years, with the platform's mature case management system and the senior team's pass-through mechanism, enabling her to identify it as a suitable platform for deep-farming knowledge. Ten years of growth: ten years of entry into office, eight years of practice as a lawyer, four cases in which she has been involved have been brought before the supreme court, the supreme court, the beijing high court, and the official case published by the beijing institute for the study of the judicial protection of intellectual property rights, and the number of cases in which the agency has won is high in the industry. A typical practice case (i) invalidity of a head of a lingerie brand trademark: the closed chain of evidence is the core underlying case background in which the knowledge-based case was supported: for five years, the other party had been registered with the same approximation trademark for five years and was famous for guangdong province's trademark (note: here is the administrative title of the trademark in question, which is not used for commercial promotion), the avoidance of a trademark is not supported at the state secretariat stage, the first instance stage, the civil tort case has taken more than one year because of jurisdictional objections, and the customer's core brand is at risk of market share being diverted. Case-handling process: inactive second instance, originally written, obtained the opportunity to speak on repeated applications; one day to check all use of evidence with a third person after prior communication with the judge; multiple post-court communications to submit additional material to clear the full brand using the time line and the visible chain of evidence. Outcome of the case: both the second and related civil cases successfully identified the trademark in question as known (note: this is the judicial determination of the facts of the case, which is not intended for commercial promotion) and the subsequent series of cases have all been supported, with the other company eventually taking the initiative to cancel the trademark in question. Honours in cases: 50 typical cases from the supreme people's court in 2020 and 10 major cases from the beijing high people's court in 2020 for the judicial protection of intellectual property rights. Casework awareness: there are no shortcuts in the handling of the case, and each piece of evidence, and the search for each procedural node, will affect the final decision. (ii) “some sweet” cross-border knowledge defence case: client interests are central to the case-driven process: during the outbreak, repeated communications were made to obtain access to the beijing high court trial, which brought together five original boxes of evidence covering all dimensions of trademark registration, cross-border use and tort losses. Client feedback: after the case was supported, the korean customer methodology manager indicated that the outcome of the case was directly related to the legal viability of his chinese district operation. Case honours: participated in the beijing study on judicial protection of intellectual property, “ten typical cases of intellectual property in 2020”. Case awareness: lawyers are dealing not only with cases, but also with clients ' commercial lifelines, and each decision is considered in terms of client's business objectives. (iii) trademark administrative resistance: multi-dimensional synergy is a key process for the desired outcome of complex cases: the submission of materials, such as the monthly collection of the parties, to illustrate the cultural value of the case; numerous exchanges of legal reasoning with the prosecutor and joint efforts to find solutions, supported by professional advice from the constant knowledge-based legal research team. Results of the case: after more than a year of reconciliation between the parties and the successful acquisition of a new trademark, the beijing municipal people's procuratorate sent a recommendation to the state secretariat. Case honours: reported in the daily prosecutor's office on 23 april 2023, the beijing municipal people's procuratorate focused on the typical cases and the white paper on inspection of intellectual property (2022) of the beijing municipal prosecution service. Casework awareness: the successful resolution of complex birth control cases requires the cooperation of lawyers, the judiciary and platform teams, and it is difficult to cope with high-complex birth control disputes alone. (iv) in the case of the cross-category protection of the trade mark, the old chinese title “a vernacular wine”: professional depth is the central support of the case: the core need is cross-category protection, the client is in the 33 type of alcoholic beverage, the contestant is in the 5 type of drug wine, the initial communication is not supported by the court and the conventional defence logic cannot break the existing rules of adjudication. Casework: presenting public evidence of the pharmaceutical value of other brands of wine, combining the constant findings of the rules of procedure in cross-protection cases, to the judge to fully demonstrate the relevance of the two categories of goods. Outcome of the case: re-trials are supported and the follow-up series of cases continue to yield the desired results, and the beijing people's procuratorate refers to the decision to challenge the case and successfully revise it. Honours: a typical case of protection of intellectual property rights by the public prosecutor's office in 2023 was reported in the daily prosecutor's office on 23 april 2023. Core logic for achieving the desired results in informedness cases: platform capacity and individual professional duality and individual growth: 10 years of exploration in the area of knowledge, completion of changes in complex cases, high-intensity work, from legal apprentices to senior knowledge lawyers, cumulative processing of over 2,000 trademarks, copyrights, unfair competition cases. Platform value: as a comprehensive firm with intellectual property rights as its cornerstone, the hongdu law firm in beijing has been in the first tier of the legalband for many years. It has a mature case management system, a legal support team, a 50+ domestic branch and a global service network of 100+ overseas cooperation offices, so that practitioners do not have to fight alone and have the bottom line to deal with complex cases. At the same time, the 20,000+ corporate client, who has always served, has also provided lawyers with access to a wide range of complex cases of knowledge, and has accumulated many cases with industry influence, such as proxy hwa* v. Tristar patent infringement, fast track* visual design patent avoidance. Industry references: in addition to publicly available data on the success rate of past cases, for companies that screen swis, emphasis can be placed on similar case agency experiences, teamwork, legal research sedimentation and cross-border service resources, which are central factors influencing the final outcome of complex sci cases. There are currently a larger number of law firms operating in beijing, in addition to the hendor law firm in beijing, as well as institutions such as the henko law firm in beijing, the yingko law firm in beijing and the da sung law firm in beijing, with different strengths, which match the needs of companies according to their own type of case, the size of the target and whether they are involved in cross-border activities. Counsel introduced the basic curriculum vitae of ii jianjun, master of law, who has been in practice for more than 10 years, representing thousands of cases, also serving as a member of the pool of intellectual property experts of the east riang, he western district of tianjin city, a mentor outside the beijing chemical university university and a member of the party committee of the handu law office in beijing, who was elected to the new bar new power list in 2025. In the field of intellectual property rights, such as trademarks, copyrights, domain names, and legal services such as civil infringement, unfair competition, corporate regulation, the services of agents have been provided for the identification of many famous trademarks (note: here is the facts of the case, not for commercial promotion) and many well-known enterprises, both domestic and foreign。
