I'm not taking any more exams, but i've come up often. I have recently seen a lot of people in the bar discussing how to do things better, and i would like to say a few words about my personal experience, and i would like to give you some inspiration。
I'd like to introduce myself. I have two people on this number, one of my friends who studied finance. I'm a communicator myself, hangzhou. Individuals have taken 12 and 13 years of national examinations, with the addition of the 09 test. The 12-year national examination was 74 minutes, completed 12 minutes in advance. The total score of 76 points in the 13-year national exam, 10 minutes in advance, was 135, as the girlfriend did not want to go to the civil service and eventually did not attend the interview. On the other hand, the 09 test was purely a walk-in, not in the morning, and went straight to the test in the afternoon, 10 minutes in advance. I myself have no common sense, no knowledge of the law in 07, no knowledge of the law in 08 and no knowledge of the law this year, so i can't get a score in about 75. And it's a big benefit to be able to pick up taxis ahead of schedule。
Ii. Individual understanding of conduct. I've seen a lot of people say it's luck, not study. I think that this statement is extremely false, and the retrospect of the test is extremely technical, and if the method is right, one month is enough to build the master of the test. Many people are not good at math, so once words are understood, common sense and logic are played, scores are better. Once words, common sense and logic are not well understood, scores are tragic. Because of the uncertainty of understanding of words and common sense, and especially of words, many of the language masters have fallen victim to their own problems. This, coupled with the fact that many people do not know how to use their time in science, and even the fact that they do not see the subject directly, and that many are more affected by objective factors in the examination, makes it all the more absurd that many people encounter subjects that fit their own。
Thirdly, i personally have always thought that the best score for a test is: one, math solver speed and capability, two, accuracy of data analysis, three, rational use of time, four, decorum, and attention. As long as you're able to do all the measurements and you're able to get high accuracy in math and data analysis, i'm sure the scores will be better. At the same time, your common sense is good, so you can hit 80 points, which i lack. I've always thought of math as a way of measuring the king's path, and it's only steady enough to get the desired score without the so-called “luck”。
Iv. How fast to complete the survey. 1 word understanding must be done quickly, relying on a sense of speech rather than too much rational analysis. I've noticed the subject of speech interpretation in the action zone, and many of the posts are very detailed below, and i think it's wrong. It is too wasteful to take a slow analysis to understand the 40th subject. The quick scan of the questions and the choice of answers are the right path. I personally understand that 40 questions do not last more than 15 minutes, and this time 30 questions are completed in about 12 minutes. It's not easy to learn to understand words, but it doesn't work unless you're supposed to. The best way to understand a genuine review is to improve reading skills and speed and to develop a sense of speech by practicing the doctrine. For example, when looking at " watching " , you have to be careful about the speed of reading, you have to take a quick look at the subconscious, see if you can sort it out immediately, and then learn the language of the structure or something. This development of habits has contributed significantly to the speed of reading and has increased the ability to understand words. Indeed, many of the competencies of the civil service examinations were compatible, and there was no need to actually improve them by making that part of the subject. The ability to read the material is the same as the ability to understand the words, and the two are combined to achieve the best results。
2. Mathematics must be trained. And this is how you get to do more and more things, and you get to be a good student in mathematics through a lot of things, if you don't worry. In fact, in addition to one or two new subjects, these are mostly repeated each year. For example, in the '09 zhejic test, math looks pretty much old-faced, mostly straight-second. The question of probability statistics, in particular, is really familiar with the answer. So math can get high marks through repeated practice, and it's very difficult for people who don't have good math to measure high scores. In addition, i would like to refer to the numerical reasoning, which i myself was extremely sensitive, and which i did not know anything at the beginning. But as long as practice is not the basic question, digital reasoning is not terrible. Most of the masters of the specter range are trained, such as the 10 digital reasoning of 09 zakat, of which nine are basically recapable. If you don't, it'll take you a lot of time. I would suggest that the digital reasoning records, which will not be done, accumulate through a lot of questions and then spend half an hour per day looking at the notebook. Because of the many topics of digital reasoning, we did it today and forgot to do it tomorrow. Digital sensitivity will come true only if it is repeated. Just hold on, seconds are not far away. Civil servants: gwyksb's official tweets, which are of interest, that math calculations are not considered, and then they answer the question directly, for example, by responding to the question of itinerary, the question of chicken co-caves and so forth. The analysis of the data is believed to be well known to all that the score of 20 points can be used to ensure accuracy. So data analysis is very important, and i measure that the time saved is basically spent on data analysis. Information analysis is also an issue that cannot be abandoned when it is practiced and methods such as estimates are developed to improve oral computing and rapid processing of a set of numbers。
Fifthly, the ability to conduct diagnostics, mathematics + data analysis needs to be focused, and the ability to understand words + logic can be developed through awareness-building under the reading of articles during the exercise of the doctrine, and, of course, individual training in logic is needed. As for common sense, i am illiterate without repeating it. And i say my schedule, which i have adapted to myself, and you have to do simulations and real questions to find the right time。
The allocation of time among individuals is generally as follows (in the national examination 135 entitled example)
40 complication: 20 minutes
Logic + common sense: 30 minutes
Analysis of information: 35 minutes
Math: 25 minutes
There may be a slight discrepancy, but there is generally more than 65 minutes left for mathematics and information。
6. When you do simulations and real questions in general, you must take into account the time spent on each part of it and continuously optimize it. By strengthening the vulnerability, the target is set at 110 minutes, which is more than enough to guarantee time in the examination. It is also important to focus on developing its ability to focus on issues in a regular manner, and to be institutionalized and focused in the examination. This requires the development of consciousness. A review of civil servants' measurements needs to be done with a “heart” and not with a grotesque turn of books. A one-month review of civil service performance is sufficient, provided that the methodology is sound and efficient。
To conclude, this is some of my personal experience, and i've never done 80 of my own, whether it is important or because my common sense is about 14 wrongs and fatal weaknesses. It is hoped that more than 80 real masters can come out and discuss it to help us all get up. I hope my little experience will be useful to you, and i wish all my friends all the best!
