Thank you, mr. President, members of the jury, hello
We insist that diplomas do not represent knowledge
It's a good argument, but it's a simple logical error. All
We believe that a diploma can prove only one piece of your learning experience and only represent the “limited” sphere of knowledge in which a person is educated, does not represent a person's intellectual capacity, does not demonstrate the full range of human abilities and the potential for future development。
We should be realistic and relevant. Diplomas do not represent the level of knowledge, either individually or in school or socially. Edison does not have any diploma, but his level of knowledge is well known; chairman mao does not have any diploma, but his level of knowledge is not very visible; li jia sung does not have any diploma, but his level of knowledge is well known. "teacher leads in the door, practises in the individual" and your level of knowledge requires continuous study in social practice, and school diplomas are monolithic and one-sided and cannot be used to represent a person at different times and at different levels of knowledge; and what is now so important in society is your real ability to practice in a holistic manner, rather than a seemingly real, but empty diploma. You believe that everyone here agrees?
It should be understood that diplomas are a recognition of the quality of your examination, that “levels” are “high levels attained in a given profession”, that any profession is well developed, that any measure is constantly evolving, that “levels” are a dynamic concept, such as “certificates of graduation from school” for students, and that they can be obtained only if they reach 60 points in the examination subject, which is a test in the past, a proof of a certain learning process, with great limitations and partiality. The diploma reflects the past and cannot represent the present, let alone the future. With the leap of modern science and technology, the speed with which knowledge is being updated, the cycles are becoming shorter, and new developments are emerging, the number of things we do not understand is growing. How can a diploma easily represent a person's level of knowledge
The level of knowledge is in your own brain. It means not only knowledge, but also technology, wealth. So, there's one skill, there's no reason to be sad! Although some people value their diplomas very much, they are regarded as the threshold for a certain unit and as proof of salary increases! But now society's demands for knowledge are even more important! If you have only one diploma and no real level of knowledge, it's not like you're going to lose it! In conclusion, there can never be parity between diplomas and levels of knowledge, and knowledge is much more important than diplomas. Only with real knowledge can real gold remain undefeated and undefeated!
How can a man survive for life? The first is to adapt to the development of society and to keep up with the times; the second is to live and learn. At a young age, students develop skills and learn long-term maintenance. If you stay on your way out of school and get your diploma, your life is over. You will always lag behind others, and you will never have to wait until you're old, and you will feel constrained by the fact that you stop learning when you're young, and you can only look at those around you twice as good as you。
In conclusion, i would like to tell you not to let each other's friends appear to be confused with sincerity! It's not so simple to mix a diploma in school, but to learn a lot, and to develop as many skills as possible for a limited period of time, remember: diplomas are not our ultimate goal! And how far do you want to go with a diploma? Master, doctor, doctor, and then what? Fighters, knights, martyrs. Do you have such a high degree to prove that you have a high level of knowledge? You have to practice!
So it's our firm belief that diplomas don't represent the level of knowledge. Thank you
