The development of human society seems complex and, indeed, with one key, one can see history — as long as it is an elite monopolistic culture — and it is inevitable that politics will be monopolized — inevitably plunged into a circle of historical tumultuous development。
Thus, since the establishment of the new china, it has been committed to the dualization of the objective of “labour of intellectuals and intellectualization of the labour force”。
In the words of the day, if people are to be the masters of the country, they must learn culture and be its masters。
In keeping with the times, we can now state this phrase as “the building of a dominant culture for all”. At its core is the need to break the elite monopoly of culture. This is not a simple slogan, but rather a real break with the intellectual monopoly and identity barriers, so that the working people are not only politically, economically, but also culturally and spiritually dominant。
The goal is clear, but implementation is difficult。
First of all, the long shirts, from the moment of their death, which do not want to take off the logo “reader”, show how difficult it is for intellectuals to work, first by asking them to lay down their shelf, to give up their privileges and to make a whole of them, and also to teach the working people, who cannot do so without the help of intellectuals. This is bound to give rise to emotional resistance on the part of a significant part of the intellectual community, which is considered to be “persecute”。
The workforce, on the other hand, had a low level of productivity at the time, and people's subsistence problems had not yet been resolved, and a considerable number of families were reluctant to send their children to work. Even when the children are in school, the children of the working population have to carry out considerable household chores。
In particular, knowledge is clearly family-transmitted, and the children of the book-sharp family have an unparalleled advantage over those of the working population. The priority given to “poor farmers” at the time was to give priority to the policy of admission on equal points, and in fact, the vast majority of those who study are also “intellectual” children。
At the time, there was a “component” and a “component” of 20 years. And so there's the "land rich and bad right" black five. In fact, this group is the intellectuals who are in conflict with the new china. Their children far outperformed the children of the working population in terms of knowledge. Besides, they have a wide range of connections. Indeed, two generations of officials and two generations of civil society intersect. I think we all know that. That is why the elite is still in the mainstream of intellectual descendants。
The test education of the past (which has not changed fundamentally to date) is clearly an advantage for future generations of intellectuals。
If the question is to be considered from the perspective of the future of national development and genuine ownership by the people, “the building of a dominant culture for all” is imperative, otherwise the “historical cycle” of war-torn development cannot be completely broken。
In fact, at present, only china has a unique institutional and civilizational foundation for achieving “the cultural heritage of all”. In other countries, either capital monopolizes knowledge or stratification is deeply entrenched, and there is no political conscious and social foundation at all。
In reality, the intellectuals are still struggling to maintain class stratification and advocate elite education. Since china is a long-standing feudal society, the sense of “elitist worship” is deeply entrenched; therefore, “elitist propaganda” also has a wide range of responsiveness among ordinary people。
This elite advocacy, which currently preserves class strangulation, is strongly supported by capital, in which “cultural capital” benefits greatly. Moreover, a significant part of this “profits well” is the use of the bottom-up population as an “intelligence tax”, such as training, remedial training, counselling, referral services, etc. People also struggled with their necks to harvest。
[continues]
Tuesday, 7 april 2026
